Comments on: Use of Funds Policy Change

By: Remy

Remy — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:33:31 +0000

i dont get what this is saying…can someone dumb it down for me…muchas gracias

By: Malery

Malery — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:07:19 +0000

Okay, so my question is,

I was already in HOF as of September 15th, 2009….I recently maybe 2 weeks ago choose to pull out but I am 120 dollars short of being back in. I AM CURRENTLY PREGNANT.

So, does my 15 months start from the time I go back in, or from the time I was in the first time.

Also, I want to breastfeed my baby when he/she is born somewhere around JULY 2, 2010 and being this 15 month rule I feel I am rushed to breast feed, let my breasts dry up, squeeze in a new consultation, and then get a 2 week pre op apt, and then the actual surgery.

AND, now what if there is no apt available in this time frame. I feel I am being forced to not be able to breastfeed if I want boobs. What now do I do? I worked hard to raise my goal and all who know me know this is a dream come true to me and I WILL get boobs as soon as possible, but the time frame isn’t long enough I feel.

By: Judith

Judith — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:41:33 +0000

Changing the policy so the models have to use their funds in a shorter period of time is a very good idea.
But I do not understand why you give them 15 months in HOF? Pregnancy is not the norm here.
So I suggest that the time frame has to be shorter:
- 3 or 6 months in HOF to send in papers.
- 6 months after sending the papers to get surgery
This would mean that the models have 9 or 12 months to use their funds.
In case of pregnancy or severy health problems (which have to be confirmed by a doctor) the period can be extended. And of course there might be other special cases to extend the time frame.
Having models to be active till they send in the papers is also a good idea, same rules for HOFers and non-HOFers.

By: lisa

lisa — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:44:35 +0000

@JIm I know and completely agree with the reasons why the J’s want the before and after pics,they got theirs before anyone else did,but it was a big shock to me to find out the the guys that helped me get my new boobs,had very little interest in seeing or knowing what they helped me get,as I am sure ,even though you are not interested in pics,you are still interested in knowing that the girls you supported put your donations to good use,yes some of my better friends (I hate using the term bene)did get topless pics (it’s no big secret I what I am comfortable doing and what I am not comfortable doing)most did not.
I guess what I am trying to say is that other than providing the J’s with before and after pics and standing up to my end of the contract (witch I have been doing 100%)after pics should be no big issue,heck except for a few of my close friends most guys lost interest in me the second I hit the HOF,but I must say I made a few close new friends after making the HOF,one of them has been here for a little over 4 years(and what a really nice guy he turned out to be)

By: Jim (39387)

Jim (39387) — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:26:45 +0000

@Lisa: I am about as interested in after pics as I am before pics, which is not very. But, it is a fulfillment of a contract with MFI, which helps MFI properly market success stories.

By: lisa

lisa — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:54:16 +0000

I don’t think there are as many bene’s interested in after phots as you might think,all in all I had about 96 different guys either donate and message or just message me,I might have missed a guy or two,but I sent my after pics to almost all of them,and had maybe 5 guys show interest in them(at least to me anyway)….

By: Amanda

Amanda — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:43:18 +0000

abreast… what a pun on words you guys!

I think that as long as people are being informed as to why funds aren’t being used (pregnancy, breastfeeding, illness, family illness, ect) and it’s documented on here (since there should be since this is the internet) than it shouldn’t be an issue. If you don’t inform your benes, then yes, the funds should be returned after X ammt of time.

I know that with the surgeon I chose, as long as the surgery is paid for in full, then your cost doesn’t go up. It “locks in” your price. Maybe you need to do business with more surgeons like that so that funds go to the doctor, and are returned only if the girl doesn’t have surgery after X amt of time. Make sense?

By: J Coverman

J Coverman — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:01:15 +0000

Do the doctor’s offices take any sort of after photos? Could something be worked out there?

And Jason is right: the whole thing comes down to benefactors wanting to be kept abreast.

Also, every mention of the ‘new site design’ makes me more curious about it…

By: Jim (39387)

Jim (39387) — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:57:24 +0000

@Jason: Thanks for the clarification. My concern on the fraudulent issue is there are quite a number of models that had their surgeries paid for, who have no after photos posted to their account. And this is more than six months after their surgeons were paid.

Of course you can nag/pester, or “offer” to enforce the substantial breach clause of the Global Agreement with a well-worded letter from a lawyer. It is amazing how the threat of a $10,000 breach of contract penalty will get people off their asses.

By: Drone

Drone — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:31:25 +0000

I had suggested a while back that MFI should consider rolling in accessorial charges to take into account things like notary fees in the UK, which are very expensive compared to US fees. Here in the US, you can often get things notarized for less than $5. In the UK, it appears that service and approach or even exceed $100.

Though I know it will pain some more than others, maybe the easiest solution is to offer a $50 completion bonus when a woman sends in her before and after photos. I know it will rankle some to give a woman “free” implants and pay her $50, but I do think the completion is important to the site and to the community.